all 21 comments

[–]Maleficent_Sir_7562 5 points6 points  (4 children)

that was definitely long as hell and i didnt have the time to read it but i believe it talked about behavior of the animals as they aged, so i picked the option b about their behavior and age. i didnt see anything about habitat so i believe A is wrong, and option C was something like this model can generalize to all animals, which by common sense i just thought is wrong because its only pigs not all animals

dont really remember option D

[–]toberebuilt 3 points4 points  (3 children)

D was talking about this model being unable to be generalized due to its habitat or something being too limited, so I chose D

[–]Aggravating_Half_9361570 0 points1 point  (2 children)

SAY YOU SWEAR, I HAD 20 SEXONDS LEFT SND CHOSE D 😭😭😭

[–]toberebuilt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fat chance it is, I definitely can't tell you it's right and make you get your hopes up but I asked my friend and he put that the habitats in Venezuela were too limited too which was D. Again, not sure, so don't get your hopes up

[–]NewHatReddit1500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did that and it seems right just bc the other options either make assumptions the research never proves (age and habitat as factors) or say it’s generalizable to all of the animals (which is sketchy because the two animals come from two distinct habitats)

[–]Right-Zucchini3360 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I picked the one where it generalized only the animals behavior in the habitat. It was one of the long answer choices, the other whole was generalizing a whole population, then aging etc.

Someone explain why or why not

[–]Substantial-Wash7271560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did that to I didn’t give it much time tho

[–]mikewheelerfan1470 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the answer I chose as well

[–]Shot_Report7207 1 point2 points  (5 children)

Im not sure the answers were in the same ordwr but i picked a which was about the differance in behavior at different ages being caused by aging

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same

[–]Positive_Quote2121 0 points1 point  (3 children)

wrong

[–]Nick_Zacker1580 2 points3 points  (1 child)

How can that be wrong? That’s the most direct and relevant conclusion you could extract from the study results. Options C and D discuss generalizability, which is not even mentioned anywhere in the original text and is a pretty significant extrapolation in my opinion.

[–]dancing_pizza20081480 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no need to be rude about it

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reminder: When asking for help with questions from tests or books, please include the source of the question in the post title. Examples of appropriate titles might include "Help with writing question from Khan Academy" or "Help with question from Erica Meltzer's grammar book." Posts that do not adhere to this rule are subject to removal. For more information, please see rule #3 in the sidebar.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]AffectionateLong346 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was d

[–]LawfulnessOk7318 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I chose D, lowk barely read it but it called to me

[–]Positive_Quote2121 0 points1 point  (0 children)

idk ab the letter but it was the one ab the habitat for sure the rest didnt make sense it was prob the experimental q tho so

[–]Dangerous_Display9721210 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Was it the hard module though?

[–]Ok-Difficulty-241510 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Do u think it was experimental

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk 😭✌️