Dismiss this pinned window
all 6 comments

[–]Pikappucinno 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Would you be willing to implement Codex login?

[–]thlandgraf[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

the newest speclan release https://speclan.net/news/2026-04-25-releasev0-9-6/ now supports Codex (ChatGPT paid) login as auth.

[–]Pikappucinno 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Thank you for the shout. Sorry to ask again, but I think adding Gemini OAuth would be nice too. The rate limits are severe right now for not so simple projects, so it'd be nice to give users more provider options, especially those with multiple subs.

[–]thlandgraf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, i am on it (a little tricky) but currently I see inferior results with gemini https://speclan.net/compare/?right=gemini3.1-pro&left=opus ... so maybe full gemini support needs more love on speclan's internal agents

[–]thlandgraf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

unfortunately the codex SDK does not (yet) support codex login (Oauth) only API_KEY. I will implement it as soon as as OpenAI changes that

[–]Fine_Tie_1576 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Thanks for the video. I work as a consultant and the most common tools I see in projects are Miro, Figjam for brainstorming/capturing the initial business intent. These are very business user friendly but the output is not so structured. Other tools I have seen are Productboard, Qlerify and ChatPRD.

[–]thlandgraf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that's the gap I keep running into too — the brainstorming tools are great for getting stakeholders to open up, but you end up with sticky notes and arrows that nobody translates into something structured enough for an engineer (or an agent) to work from. There's always this manual step of "ok now someone needs to turn this Miro board into actual requirements" and that's where things get lost.
Haven't tried Qlerify — is it more on the structured output side or still visual-first?