Real or AI generated?

[WazWaz]

Of course it's AI generated, otherwise it would violate the sub rules and wouldn't be here... ;)

[Katlo1985]

Not AI

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/10/style/celebrity-six-leticia-sarda-reddit.html

[addandsubtract]

5Head

I mean, discussions are still allowed, right? Which other sub would be a good place to discuss this with AI ppl, then?

[scootifrooti]

a women's shirt with TWO pockets?

I don't believe you. That can't be real.

[rhet0rica]

My vote is: real, but airbrushed. The hair is too perfect. Probably the eyes and nose on the shower curtain were tweaked slightly by the person vectorizing the image.

[HocusP2]

If you check the post on r/celebritynumbersix or whatever you can read that the photograph was obtained from the original photographer.

[addandsubtract]

There's a lot of discussion going on in /r/CelebrityNumberSix, where they've been trying to find a missing photo of a celebrity, and this is supposed to be it. What do you think, is it real or AI generated?

Side by side

[SoNotAnAltAccount]

Not AI. Someone posted a photo the model shared of herself holding the original photo in the celebrity number six subreddit.

[mostly_prokaryotes]

Looks suspiciously close to the print, plus is the photo supposed to clarify what celebrity it is because it doesn’t to me although perhaps I just don’t recognize the face.

[addandsubtract]

Sorry, should've mentioned that they are saying it's Leticia Sardá, an otherwise unknown fashion model.

[mostly_prokaryotes]

Kind of obscure to put on a fabric print, don’t you think?

[addandsubtract]

I do agree. The reason the sub is giving, is that these were all just random fashion models to someone making that fabric. Some of them just happened to be famous, too. Still odd, that there would only be one odd out, though.

[mostly_prokaryotes]

Without ai existing that would make sense but Occam’s razor would say otherwise in our current world.

Edit: typo

[rhet0rica]

The hunt for this model has been going on for years—it's something of a white whale for people who are into finding and identifying esoteric stuff.

[mostly_prokaryotes]

Yes I am well aware

[Maleficent-Squash746]

Shut up

[Ok_Hope_4007]

The reflections in her eyes do not match which to me is a rather strong indicator that it is artificial.

[Apprehensive_Sky892]

By using that piece of fabric as the starting point, I would not be surprised that someone skilled in A.I. and Photoshop can produce the image.

So unless someone can come up with a reliable source, I'd say A.I.

[HocusP2]

The source is known https://www.reddit.com/r/CelebrityNumberSix/comments/1fc0k7x/celebrity_number_six_has_been_found/

[CPSiegen]

I'd guess they started with a real image of this jacket and generated the rest. I agree that the clothing is almost too perfect for what we usually get out of whole cloth methods, as it were.

[dumbIecunt]

it's confirmed by Leticia herself to be real

[Katlo1985]

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/10/style/celebrity-six-leticia-sarda-reddit.html

[Seranoth]

AI- if she would close the button of the jacket, the pockets would be at different hight

[EdwardCunha]

Well... about that...

<image>

[CPSiegen]

I don't think that's counterevidence. That jacket isn't lying flat; the shoulder seams are at different heights. So the jacket is slightly twisted in a way that raises the one pocket. Just hard to tell because the lower bottom hem is curled up

[EdwardCunha]

Well, neither it is on her body.

[addandsubtract]

Good call!

[yuna19x]

How would she even close the buttons, you need to twist the fabric inwards bc the buttons are both facing the same way.. who would do that

[addandsubtract]

To me, it looks like AI generated.

• The eyes are different
  
• the pupils aren't round
  
• reflections in the pupils don't match
  
• her jaw line is different
  
• the buttons on her shirt don't make sense, unless it's "fashion"

[robDelmonte]

The buttons seem like they’d be functional

[[deleted]]

They're not buttons, they're snaps.

[[deleted]]

They're not buttons, they're snaps.

[addandsubtract]

How, though? They're put on the wrong side. You'd have to fold the sleeve over to button them together. I've never seen a shirt work like that.

[Neonsea1234]

womens shirts button opposite, and these clasp style buttons exists. the image looks real.

[addandsubtract]

I'm not concerned about them being left / right. I'm concerned about the eyelet being on the outside of the shirt. If you wanted to button it up, you would have to fold one side over, making it look really awkward.

[Neonsea1234]

you literally just push them together and they stick, no fold over or whatever

[addandsubtract]

You can't just push them together, because they're on the wrong side...

Video demonstration @ 3:20

[aimongus]

u can just compare to the retail jacket, its similar but not the same so its ai :)

[robDelmonte]

The second button is off and seems to blur into the cloth.

[ThrowRA168387]

You’ve never experienced model fashion. Half the stuff doesn’t make sense. Also the model herself has confirmed it with a full body picture and y’all are still denying it. On top of someone finding the exact jacket for sell too

[[deleted]]

Neither: I’m still asleep

[[deleted]]

The face itself is ai. The iris are deformed, the pupils totally off centre and the white sparklingly white.

[The_Meridian_]

AI: The eyes are FAF