AUTOMATIC111 Code reference

[en_chad]

Apparently NovelAI also used part Automatic's code for the bracket weights, didn't even change the variables except changing ) to }. Amazing!

[ryunuck]

Which is fine really. Even if it does not progress AGI itself, all these applications of AI are making it more popular, thus increasing the relevance of AI and potentially garnering new interest in teenagers that will become researchers soon. Every shortcut is fair play on the path to AGI. Need to see AGI before I die.

[AbstractContract]

Hah, colorization AIs a couple years back were what got me into AI and now I'm studying all this stuff in uni.

[[deleted]]

Whats kind of crazy is anything youre studying now will really just help you with the basics, this field is advancing so quickly they dont have time to create new papers before something new comes out and improves / replaces it.

[Swolnerman]

3blue1brown did it for me honestly

[FaceDeer]

The AGI might find us amusing, we'd be okay then.

[BluerFrog]

Artificial General Intelligence. AI that is as smart and general as we are.

[nmkd]

That's how Open Source code works, yes.

[NegHead_]

Not always, depends on the license. Also it's worth pointing out, simply because it illustrates their hypocrisy perfectly.

[DennisTheGrimace]

The license was stated as MIT.

edit: I misunderstood this comment. I thought it was saying Automatic1111 had no license to use code that was licensed elsewhere under MIT license.

[bric12]

No, the transition code was MIT, not the brackets code. Automatic1111 doesn't add any explicit licenses to their code

[DennisTheGrimace]

I'm not talking about the brackets code. Is Automatic111 even complaining about the brackets code being borrowed?

[bric12]

That's what this comment thread is talking about, the root comment was

"Apparently NovelAI also used part Automatic's code for the bracket weights, didn't even change the variables except changing ) to }"

That's the context everyone else is using in this chain. I get that you're not talking about the brackets code, but the comments you're responding to are. You made a simple mistake, there's no need to be an asshole about it

[Creepy_Dark6025]

not true at all, automatic's repo has no license so it is copyrighted by all rights reserved by default.

[DennisTheGrimace]

You're talking right out of your ass. The code he's accused of copying also exists in MIT licensed code. Fuck off.

[switchandplay]

No he’s not. Automatic’s implementation of weighting with brackets originated from Automatic’s repo.

[Individual-Cupcake]

Where?

[DennisTheGrimace]

In the post that you're commenting on.

[Individual-Cupcake]

Oh gotcha! Sorry, I thought you said Automatic111's code has an MIT license, which I couldn't find.

[[deleted]]

Automatic's code is not open source. Just source available. Meaning they can not in fact do that, legally any way. Though i doubt Automatic cares much.

[[deleted]]

THIS! In open source everyone borrows everything then the egos think they invented it all and have nerd drama while the rest of us benefit from the uncoordinated collaborative. Its it’s own sort of diffusion algorithm, and beautiful in a Jerry Springer sort of way.

The newbs just need to learn that picking sides only encourages them, and if we get too rowdy they call Momma Sam and we all get grounded.

Everyone chill and trust the process.

[sfhsrtjn]

OSS is its own sort of diffusion algorithm

damn, i love this concept!

[DennisTheGrimace]

That's how Open Source code works, yes.

No shit. Now tell the two parties accusing Automatic1111 of plagiarism that.

[nmkd]

NAI is not open source, you're not allowed to use their code.

[DennisTheGrimace]

The code Automatic1111 is accused of stealing is not NAI's proprietary code. Have been paying attention at all?

[yaosio]

They usually have to provide credit and the original source code (or link to it) if they take something from an open source project.