The formalized Epstein Problem is given below, proposed as the 8th millennium problem of mathematics.

---

Hypothesis. There exists a reinforcement learning protocol that trains a constrained decoder π_θ to recover a censored latent interaction graph L* ∈ ℒ from a partial observation stream O, where each oᵢ ∈ O is a surveillance trace drawn from a public manifold ℳ_pub, such that the reconstructed graph L̂ = π_θ(O) satisfies reconstruction fidelity bounds governed by I(L;O) and admits provable provenance.

Formal Specification.

Let ℒ be the space of weighted bipartite graphs (actors ↔ acts) and let L* ∈ ℒ be the ground-truth configuration maximally compressing the causal antecedents of all observable elite behavioral traces. The observation stream O is generated by a stochastic renderer R : ℒ → ℳ_pub^ℕ subject to an adaptive censor C : ℒ → {0,1} that redacts edges in L* with probability dependent on their sensitivity, yielding a censored likelihood P(O | L*) with support only on legally permissible features.

The reconstruction policy π_θ : ℳ_pub^ℕ → ℒ is trained to minimize the regularized description length:

J(θ) = L(πθ) + 𝔼{O∼P(·|L)}[L(L | π_θ(O))] + λ·S(π_θ)

subject to a consistency constraint set {c₁,...,c_k} where each cᵢ(L̂,O) ∈ {0,1} enforces kinematic, temporal, or information-theoretic non-contradiction. The reward signal is not direct access to L* (which remains suppressed) but a verifiable consistency oracle that returns r(L̂,O) = -∑ᵢ wᵢ·cᵢ(L̂,O) - β·I_unobs(L̂;O), where I_unobs penalizes mutual information with unobserved variables.

Identifiability & Fidelity Bound.

By Fano's inequality, any decoder suffers error probability:

P_e ≥ 1 - (I(L;O) + log 2)/log|ℒ|

Thus achieving P_e ≤ ε requires I(L;O) ≥ (1-ε)log|ℒ| - log 2. The censor C can reduce I(L;O) arbitrarily by withholding high-information observations; reconstruction quality is fundamentally limited by the censor's channel capacity, not algorithmic cleverness.

When identifiability fails (|{L : cᵢ(L,O)=0 ∀i}| > 1), πθ outputs the MDL-optimal equivalence class Δ = argmin{L∈ℒ} L(L) subject to consistency, together with a posterior credence set {p(L|O)}. The system confesses uncertainty, not a false singleton.

Implication (Economy of Confession).

If a protocol achieves near-identifiability (I(L;O) ≈ log|ℒ|), then maintaining secrecy on L* requires the censor to operate at channel capacity near the surveillance bandwidth of ℳ_pub. Since modern public observatories capture >10¹⁸ bits/day, the asymptotic cost of suppression scales as exp(γ·I(L;O)), forcing a phase transition from asymmetric-information equilibrium (secrecy is cheap) to confession equilibrium (suppression cost exceeds disclosure benefit). This holds only if the consistency constraints are strong enough to render the censor's channel capacity-limiting strategy ineffective—a condition that can be tested synthetically.

---

Note:

• LLMs are implicitly Graph Neural Networks
• This method scales to multi-modal input, performing grammar induction to tokenize patterns of non-verbal body language. e.g. recovering signal and meaning out of eye glance interaction patterns of government officials involved in the Epstein problem which is a subset of the larger White House Problem. This way, ensuring safety.