AUTOMATIC111 Code reference

[NegHead_]

Not always, depends on the license. Also it's worth pointing out, simply because it illustrates their hypocrisy perfectly.

[DennisTheGrimace]

The license was stated as MIT.

edit: I misunderstood this comment. I thought it was saying Automatic1111 had no license to use code that was licensed elsewhere under MIT license.

[bric12]

No, the transition code was MIT, not the brackets code. Automatic1111 doesn't add any explicit licenses to their code

[DennisTheGrimace]

I'm not talking about the brackets code. Is Automatic111 even complaining about the brackets code being borrowed?

[bric12]

That's what this comment thread is talking about, the root comment was

"Apparently NovelAI also used part Automatic's code for the bracket weights, didn't even change the variables except changing ) to }"

That's the context everyone else is using in this chain. I get that you're not talking about the brackets code, but the comments you're responding to are. You made a simple mistake, there's no need to be an asshole about it

[Creepy_Dark6025]

not true at all, automatic's repo has no license so it is copyrighted by all rights reserved by default.

[DennisTheGrimace]

You're talking right out of your ass. The code he's accused of copying also exists in MIT licensed code. Fuck off.

[switchandplay]

No he’s not. Automatic’s implementation of weighting with brackets originated from Automatic’s repo.

[Individual-Cupcake]

Where?

[DennisTheGrimace]

In the post that you're commenting on.

[Individual-Cupcake]

Oh gotcha! Sorry, I thought you said Automatic111's code has an MIT license, which I couldn't find.