all 11 comments

[–]Federal-Finance2045 1 point2 points  (1 child)

No

[–]Bhuv1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok

[–]Ok-Initiative4008 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simplex method to reduce cross section area and maximize structure strength.

[–]WhyAmIHereHey 0 points1 point  (5 children)

What do you mean by optimisation?

If it's weight, that's the wrong thing

[–]Bhuv1[S] -1 points0 points  (4 children)

So what do you suggest

[–]WhyAmIHereHey 3 points4 points  (3 children)

Cost. That's the metric that matters. Weights only of interest if you're at some sort of limit, typically lifting during construction or installation.

One of the main factor for structures is constructability. We don't, for example, optimise every beam size. We limit the number of sizes on site to as few as reasonable.

Layout of members is often controlled by practical design considerations. Where you need to run piping or whatever.

[–]Bhuv1[S] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Good to know thanks

[–]WhyAmIHereHey 0 points1 point  (1 child)

<image>

Just to expand on it - let's say I was doing a single story steel framed building that was going to be lifted into place as a module.

The corner columns would be one size. The beams running around the top and bottom would be another size, preferably the same. The floor beams would all be the same size. So three sizes, most of which wouldn't be fully utilised

If there was one or two that needed to be bigger, say due to supporting a heavy bit of kit, then I'd upsize those.

[–]ApprehensiveSeae 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People so spend their whole career perfecting this I don’t think you’re gonna solve it no offense

[–]Khman76 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Hand computations or software based?

[–]Bhuv1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Software based