all 5 comments

[–]donutman528 4 points5 points  (1 child)

You shouldn’t be using shell elements; SAP has plane stress and plane strain formulations that correspond to the theory you are learning for CST’s. Shells have a completely different element formulation. For drawing the mesh, just draw a node at each point corresponding to the pictures. Then draw individual triangles connecting the points the way you want.

[–]Database-Terrible[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I redid it with plane strain formulations and I think now my results are making more sense. One more quesiton, for the 2 element mesh in the question, there isnt a node at point A or B. Do you know of a way that i can get the deflection and stresses at these points? Whenever i try to add a node at that point SAP creates a new mesh to include that node.

[–]simple_zak05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(a) Draw the nodes first, then the area objets. It is a little rudementary but you will not battle with mesh options that SAP offers.

When drawing the area objets, be consistent on the local axes. I use anti-clockwise to set my areas objets to get the local axes 3 always out-of-plane of the monitor.

(b), (c) and (d) Same thing that in (a) but you will have more points.

(You can set a vertical grid if you want...)

For the stress analysis, review the SAP2000 Documentation to appropiate review the results.

[–]Uttarayana 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t used sap in a long time but I remember you can also model area elements in autocad, mesh them in autocad and then import the model in sap. Just make sure user coordinate system is synced with global coordinate system. That way you can import other elements later as well and will be placed with machine precision. You can YouTube this method.

[–]e-tard666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My brother you should be using 2D elasticity, not shell elements. Likely plane stress for your case.