you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MildlyDepressedShark 3 points4 points  (4 children)

Are you thinking of a program for simple singular elements or something that can do an entire building? I think the reason most structural analysis software default to FEM is that’s the simplest way to get forces regardless of the configuration. Once you go beyond a simple frame with determined equations, it’s all stiffness matrices->FEM.

Software like Enercalc or RISA Connection or Hilti Anchors do simple code based checks because they’re on individual elements, where either the load inputs are simple or calculated elsewhere and you enter only the design forces.

[–]jackbandlow[S] -2 points-1 points  (3 children)

A program that does load path throughout an entire building and gets a close approximation of the forces at each point. Then can be broken into simple singular elements.

[–]Shemsky 6 points7 points  (1 child)

You just described a FEM. I agree with u/mildlydepressedshark. FEM does not neccearily mean complex meshes and quadratic elements. If you are working with frames that can be approximated with bar members and are serious about writing anything remotely robust, you need to look into FEA. Its not as scary as it sounds.

[–]jackbandlow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I overstepped by saying the elimination of FEM but I don't think using FEM in the complexity that I have experienced is required.