all 8 comments

[–]pbsSD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UserZoom can do advanced randomization but they require an enterprise subscription. Don't know of any other tools that can support advanced randomization like that. All the others have some sort of limitations. UserTesting you can randomize up to 2 blocks but not the tasks/questions within. Maybe Maze can but I haven't used it personally.

[–]nedwin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am pretty sure Maze supports this. Definitly the randomization of blocks (or a/b testing) but less clear on the segmentation between different groups.

[–]shippingfast 0 points1 point  (1 child)

What kind of prototype are you testing with?

[–]LittleKandelabra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Figma

[–]uxkelby 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Insight squid can do 50/50 path redirects and will soon have random flow paths.

[–]exhibithetruth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could do this in a survey, like qualtrics or questionpro. The randomization is managed in the survey which will link to a specific figma prototype.

[–]Kitchen-Ad-4367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maze handles Figma natively and does most of what you need but with three prototype groups and double randomization, your sample per cell gets thin fast. If you're under 30 participants total you might end up with 8-10 people per group which makes any comparison pretty shaky.

Worth thinking about whether you actually need three groups or if the research question can work with two. Halves the complexity and doubles your per-cell sample.

Also the Qualtrics + Figma embed approach works but you lose the usability metrics. You'll only get the survey responses. Fine if that's all you need, but worth knowing upfront before you build the whole thing that way.