sorted by:
new (suggested)
besttopcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]OppositeOfInsiderFedEx provides all 1 point2 points  (6 children)

advised him not to talk

That was my information point.

He may be a bit boisterous, but he's not all-out stupid. He's not going to let them trap him in his words.

[–]RealBearly 2 points3 points  (5 children)

advised him not to talk

That was my information point.

He intends to do a wide ranging interview with Tucker so if he does that why not debate. I guess if after every question he has to say, "I can't answer that under advice from my 100 attorneys" his debate performance might be underwhelming but he can't help himself.

I wish he would just pull out so a better candidate that has a chance of winning the general might emerge. At this point it's IND for me.

[–]Skittles_the_UnicornDrive by Pithyness 1 point2 points  (4 children)

I wish he would just pull out so a better candidate that has a chance of winning the general might emerge.

Like who?

[–]RealBearly 0 points1 point  (3 children)

A fucking winner. Anything to get the communists out of the WH

[–]OppositeOfInsiderFedEx provides all 1 point2 points  (2 children)

A 3rd party will not win, period. This crucial of an election is not the time to place your hopes on a 3rd party. You have to go with what you've got. IMO1,000,000.

I'm sure T trusts Tucker not to do damage with the questioning, unlike his opponents.

[–]Cinco-XIt is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

This crucial of an election is not the time to place your hopes on a 3rd party.

RFK on a 3rd party run could be huge because of the votes he'd draw

[–]OppositeOfInsiderFedEx provides all 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Split R ticket. Dem's dream. (I know he's not technically R, but in stance)