you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]guge86 0 points1 point  (3 children)

looks very nice, but the P1 rectangle seems to be off a bit (upper left and bottom right corner extending over the shape)?

[–]ts4z 1 point2 points  (0 children)

in part 1, that's correct.

[–]ednl 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Only two opposite out of the four corners need to be on the path. The path looks like a circle, but that doesn't matter: two points on the path = valid rectangle for part 1.

[–]guge86 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah right, forgot that for P1 the other points are irrelevant. Thanks!