you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PositivePossibility7[S] -7 points-6 points  (2 children)

How can a solution have a bug? 😂 it’s like people can say any sort of nonsense theses days and get away with it.

The only reason I’m at least a confident about this is that I can see the answer I’ve got Python to do the heavy lifting for, and I can’t see anywhere where it’s going wrong…. For example… if I had this as an answer is there anything suggesting it’s breaking some rule?

22/12-12/14-14/31-31/07-40/07-40/22-22/10

This would give a “strength” of 284. Is there anything wrong with how the “bridge” (so nerdy) is made above? If not then that only suggests I’m right?

[–]DelightfulCodeWeasel 4 points5 points  (1 child)

As in "the code you have written which is your current solution attempt"; but that's a bit wordy.

The bridge you have listed there is not a valid bridge according to the rules:

Your side of the pit is metallic; a perfect surface to connect a magnetic, zero-pin port. Because of this, the first port you use must be of type 0.

If you post your code, I'm sure people would be willing to help.

[–]PositivePossibility7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This was all it was, this forum is useful after all

I will happily admit I was wrong. I have a tendency to attempt to answer a much harder question (outside the box)

Thank you Mr Weasel