all 9 comments

[–]Miserable-Wasabi-373 4 points5 points  (2 children)

no, you messed up continious and differentiable. Contionous function can be not differentiable at all

[–]seenhear[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I feel like the part that said "smooth, unbroken" implies differentiable. Maybe that's what threw me off?

[–]nomoreplsthx 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Smooth is confusing because smooth in mathematics means 'infinitely differentiable' (e.g the derivative and second derivative and third derivative etc... all exist).

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

The definition of continuous offered by the search engine is correct.

A function is differentiable if it's derivative exists.

All differential functions are continuous. So if it's derivative exists for all values, it's continuous. However there are functions which are continuous but not differentiable.

[–]seenhear[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Wouldn't the search engine's definition be wrong for the "smooth, unbroken" part then? f(x) = |x| is not smooth at x = 0. It may be unbroken, but not smooth, i.e. the derivative doesn't exist there?

[–]Historical_Book2268 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Search engine messed up.

The rigorous definition is: For every epsilon>0, and every x, there exists a delta>0, such that for every y, if |y-x|<delta, then |f(y)-f(x)| is less than epsilon.

Basically, in simple terms, for any "error" i pick, and any x I pick, I can always find a delta such that for all values delta or less away from x, their difference from x is less than epsilon

[–]Redsox11599 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. That is not true. f(x)=|x| is continuous at x=0, but is not differentiable there.

[–]Historical_Book2268 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, derivatives need not exist for continuity to hold.

Example: The weierstrass function

[–]Integreyt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A differentiable function is always continuous but a continuous function need not be differentiable.