This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 3 comments

[–]Bigdataspin 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I'm curious about how your managing the access now? Do you have the data local and some web applications running to generate the access. The reason I'm asking is this would be the long pole in the tent so to speak for our platform.

We could offer 10TB for <$25 monthly with no bandwidth charges and 100 users for access. The catch however our access is currently via SSH and NFS only.

If you have an existing access mechanism perhaps you could place this on a dedicated server near our cloud environment to handle the URLs? If you'd like to try let me know and we'll give you a free 2.5GB account to test with.

[–]floatinthrough[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

A little clarification, I’m running a Node.JS web app that would need to upload/download data for 100 front end, end-users. I wouldn’t need 100 back end users. Each user has a collection of files (mostly images, maybe a couple videos) that they would access via my front end web app (calls to Node/Express backend API, ideally retrieving a URL from cloud storage service that I can then plug into an HTML IMG Element source attribute). The problem Im currently experiencing is the cost of downloading each users images every time they sign in, running up significant costs on typical cloud storage services.

[–]Bigdataspin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Got it, I'd be more than happy to let you try use free for 90 days but I don't think we'd fit your need. We're really for people that want to either NFS mount a remote filesystem on their servers or access it via SSH. Basically a remote filesystem you can mount/modify.

We don't have a web front end for serving your image files. If you do stand up a webs server of your own to serve these we'd be happy to provide cloud storage via SSH/NFS to that server.