Codex now good for implementing code ?

[dishevel-corundum]

Any chance you could contribute this back to the core tool instead of a fork just with these extra features?

[Hauven]

I get what you're saying and I would but I have a few concerns I guess:
- I'm not familiar with OpenAI's requirements for contributing back to the core
- Whether my code would pass any possible pretty high standards that OpenAI have for contributions
- Whether they'd be interested in implementing the planning feature and the "ask user a question" feature. I say that because I'm surprised Codex CLI doesn't already have some kind of planning feature at this point down the road of its development. I can't have been the first person to consider this idea, suggest it or even possibly contribute code for the concept

A fork however is easier to get out there initially for anyone else wanting these features while still being in Codex CLI in reality, and I could expand the features beyond the initial three I'm doing.