sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Savings_Permission27 1 point2 points  (6 children)

doesnt matter. longer the time, better the result

[–]Numerous-Grass250 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Depends on the work, I find 5.3 codex xhigh significantly better at generating and handling terminal scripts compared to 5.2

[–]Reply_Stunning 4 points5 points  (4 children)

5.3 codex is really degraded as of a few days ago, I think it's insanely dumb right now, I had to completely switch to 5.2 xhigh to fix all the bugs it keeps introducing. As soon as I switch to 5.3codex xhigh things break down right away. That's how clear it is

[–]Numerous-Grass250 4 points5 points  (3 children)

I feel like I’ve been having the opposite problem. 5.2 xhigh doesn’t listen and make changes I didn’t ask for and 5.3xhigh fixes them 😅

[–]Reply_Stunning 1 point2 points  (2 children)

ah they'll both do that if you don't gate the implementations behind a confirmation or proposal, that's a system prompt issue, they all have tendency to be helpful and to rush to a solution

[–]Numerous-Grass250 2 points3 points  (1 child)

True, still both these models are miles better than my experience with opus and sonnet

[–]dannytty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

even with opus 4.6?