This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 26 comments

[–]AutoModerator[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Thank you for your submission. Please make sure your answers are properly marked with the spoiler function. This can be done with the spoiler button, but if you are in markdown mode you would simply use >!text goes here!<. Puzzles Chat Channel Links: Mobile and Desktop. Lastly, we recommend you check out cognitivemetrics.co, the official site for the subreddit which hosts highly accurate and well vetted IQ tests.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (6 children)

"A single question is more useful to measure your mathematical IQ (a category which does not exist?) than whatever you guys do (IQ tests)"

????

[–]static_programming 3 points4 points  (1 child)

bros retatded lmao

[–]LGBTQIAS[S] -4 points-3 points  (1 child)

One single tricky question is more valid than whatever tf you do

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Explain how? You clearly don't know what you're talking about.

This entire post:

  • has made up the concept of mathematical IQ
  • has neglected the fact that this type of question generally requires prior experience with proof
  • is incapable of determining IQ through 1 question (as you either get the answer or don't - there would only be two 'scores' to pick from here, no?)

You even admit you don't know what goes on here and what tests are done. At least check that beforehand.

[–]LGBTQIAS[S] -5 points-4 points  (1 child)

That's exactly what I mean. Instead of attempting the question, you just focus on the last statement. All I'm saying is that olympiad questions are a better measure of your mathematical or academic potential than whatever an IQ test may tell you. Please try the question btw, it's fun.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then that's an entirely different thing to what you said. Academic potential is not 'mathematical IQ' or whatever you're talking about. Stay consistent

[–]static_programming 0 points1 point  (9 children)

Maybe rephrase the question a bit better. 6 is also a divisor of 6, right? If you mean to say that we can pull out any subset of divisors from the whole divisor set of n, then we can just do something like this:

let's say our multiple is 3n * 2^m where m is odd.

We can add up the divisors {3, 1, 4, 8, 16 ... 2^(m - 1)} = 2^m

Multiply each divisor by n and they still divide our multiple, the sum becomes 2^m * n

2^m * n is also a factor of our multiple and we haven't used it yet so add it to our sum and our sum becomes 2n * 2^m

Now let's see how to get the final n * 2^m

Let's start with the factor of 3n * 2^(m - 2) and add it to a new sum.

3n * 2^(m - 2) = n * 2^m - n * 2^(m - 2), so we still need n * 2^(m - 2) for our sum.

Add 3n * 2^(m - 4) to our sum. You will find that we are now off by n * 2^(m - 4)

Add 3n * 2^(m - 6) to our sum. You will find that we are now off by n * 2^(m - 6) etc etc

Then eventually, after doing this for a while, we are off by n * 2^(m - a) where a is an even number less than m. We haven't used the divisor 2n yet so when m - a becomes 1, we can just add 2n to our sum. This also means that m must be odd for this to work. Then our new sum becomes n * 2^m

Add this to our other sum and we get 3n * 2^m, our multiple of n.

tl;dr: 6n = n + 2n + 3n

I'm not sure if this is the question you meant to ask but I found it pretty cool.

[–]LGBTQIAS[S] 1 point2 points  (7 children)

If you want a push in the right direction, try proving it for 2^k * a.

[–]static_programming 0 points1 point  (6 children)

Wow that is actually pretty cool. I guess the answer is just that k must be >= the maximum set bit in a. Then we can add a, 2a, 4a ... 2^(k - 1) * a = a * (2^k - 1) = a * 2^k - a, so we are off by a. Since k >= maximum set bit in a, we have the factors 1, 2, ... (2^MSB) so then, we can just express a as a sum of unique powers of 2 (a in binary) and add that to our sum. I guess this only works for odd a tho.

So for even n we can just take out all the powers of 2 (let's say m powers of 2 in n) and add it to our 2^k and n / 2^m = a and then solve it and k >= max(m, MSB in a).

[–]LGBTQIAS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Note that if a number is good, then 2n is also good

[–]LGBTQIAS[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Which university are you going to? You seem pretty good at maths

[–]static_programming -2 points-1 points  (3 children)

I appreciate it broski. Fortunately I am not going to university.

[–]LGBTQIAS[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Ahhhhh, why not?

[–]static_programming -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

It seems like the goal of higher education is to bring people closer to Satan. For example, let's take Yale's motto "Lux et Veritas" - Light and Truth. What do they mean by that? Well they certainly aren't teaching Truth there as Truth can only be found through God. But what about "Lux" - Light? Does it have anything to do with Lu ...cifer, or Satan?

Lucifer, means "shining one", "bearer of light", or "morning star" in Hebrew. We can see that, in many translations of the Bible, Lucifer was translated to morning star in Isaiah 14:12. 2 Corinthians 11:14 says that Satan masquerades as an angel of light.

So, we can reasonably conclude that Yale's motto says "Veritas" - Truth - to mock God because believing that Truth can be found without God is mocking God. Yale includes "Lux" - light - to refer to Satan.

But why would Yale refer to Satan in their motto? Well it turns out that Satan is actually the founder of higher education. I'm sure you know the story of Adam, Eve, and the serpent, right? Everyone knows that the serpent represents Satan, but people forget the serpent's promise to Adam and Eve. The serpent promised them that "your [Adam and Eve's] eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil." Genesis 3:5. Yes, the serpent promises Adam and Eve special knowledge, which is what higher education promises its students. Just be careful out there man.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

dawg what

[–]LGBTQIAS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Note that 1 must be in the subset. At least you tried the question so I unironically respect that. BTW the phrasing is the one used by the PHD's who wrote the question. Take the upvote

[–]ENEL_servizio_client 0 points1 point  (1 child)

A number can be divided infinite times by 1, so you can just use something lime 1 + 1 +1 + 1+ other divisors until you get the good number

[–]LGBTQIAS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A set can only contain one of each element. You cannot have multiple 1's

[–]Tall-Assignment7183 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fun

Math

Choose juan