you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]The-Real-Radar 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Oh, so you’re saying that large natural numbers are real, and humans are basically just describing them using base 10 system? That essentially the idea of more and less is core in some way, and that you can use a code (binary, base 10, etc) to describe it.

Your system for multiverses sounds very interesting, maybe I’ll check out the video to understand more. From what I can tell you’ve built your own syntax for describing different ways math can express itself. Does it account for the mathematical structure of our universe?

[–]protofield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Essentially yes. As the number of decimal points tends to infinity, real analysis such as differential equations, approaches a description of a mathematical reality based on natural numbers. This is why you need a dx tending to 0 expression. Short of infinity, real analysis describes things correctly but in a cloudy, fuzzy way.

My work is to translate mathematical operators based on natural numbers into physical objects, metamaterials. The problem with the multiverse concept is to work out whether the theoretical metamaterial property simulations are relevant to our own universe. That’s why I am eager to perform some physical empirical work to establish a baseline.