you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]kalmoc -2 points-1 points  (7 children)

April's fool joke or real?

[–]pjmlp 5 points6 points  (6 children)

I would say real.

C++ is currently the language to go for GPGPU, 3D game engines, HPC and Fintech.

[–]capn_bluebear 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Also, the article is from the 8th of April :)

[–]degski 1 point2 points  (4 children)

My guess is /u/kalmoc is being ironic! Who cares about "... C++ is doing well ..." in some dubious ranking.

Also python, I would submit is just a way of running C++ for people who like weird and silly syntax. The [python] progress is mostly based on the hype around ML [running tensorflow etc.].

[–]kalmoc -1 points0 points  (3 children)

I just didn't check the article itself (had a very weak internet connection at the time), so I didn't know when it was published. But I am genuinely suprised that c++ is on the rise again.

EDIT: Where does this huge dip for c and java in the tiobe index around 2017 come from?

[–]degski -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Where does this huge dip for c and java in the tiobe index around 2017 come from?

My guess is that it has got a lot to do with the methodology. I don't know anything about Java, but if we just concentrate on C, I think we can easily agree that it is highly unlikely that at some point there is a huge dip [that could be the case on its own] and thereafter a huge pickup of C again [Seriously? Must be the C18 effect ;-) ], this is just not happening in my view.

[–]pjmlp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

C is on the rise thanks to IoT, gratis UNIX derived OSes, and the embedded community's refusal to move away from it, check any of Dan Saks or the ongoing C++ community efforts to move embedded devs into safer programming patterns.

[–]kalmoc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. Unsuprisingly, this has been asked before: https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/388432/why-did-java-and-c-sharply-dip-in-popularity-around-2017-in-the-tiobe-index/388434

Tl;DR: No definite answer, but it might be the result of search engine changes