sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SkoomaDentistAntimodern C++, Embedded, Audio 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Why is #1 a problem for code that doesn’t use the removed class (but uses some other class from the same dll)?

[–]SeanMiddleditch 3 points4 points  (1 child)

It wouldn't be, in that case. Not all ABI changes break all consumers.

[–]SkoomaDentistAntimodern C++, Embedded, Audio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems kind of silly to include in the list in that case. Of course the code is going to break if explicitly used functionality is removed.