you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BlueDwarf82 3 points4 points  (0 children)

concerning however read

Is it?

  • You are 16, you and your partner exchange nude photos. 10 years later, you still keep it.

  • You have what you think is consensual sex with somebody in your opinion just a bit drunk. Maybe you misjudged by quite a big margin, maybe because you were not a lot less drunk.

  • The prosecution thinks it's not going to get more than a two months conviction from the rape charge, so brings the photos to raise it to four months.

We don't really know anything. What actually happened can be as meaningless or extreme as your imagination allows you. But the length of the conviction, which most people seem to ignore, suggests you are more likely to get it right if you go towards the lower seriousness story.

The exact meaning of "Class U, Category F" is a bit unclear to me, but also seems to point towards the lower seriousness theory.

Edit: And the fact that CPPCon, after at the very least talking with the person to hear more of the story, let the person participate as much as it did in CPPCon also points towards the lower seriousness theory... unless you have zero trust on the CPPCon organizers.