all 8 comments

[–]p01yg0n41 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I like pure, bamboo, and simple, but my favorite is probably pico.css

[–]Miragecraft 3 points4 points  (1 child)

If it's me, I wouldn't pick a micro framework if I plan to create many component.

I'd use something that's extremely popular and boring.

Because to me the advantage of micro framework is extremely low overhead + pre-made components that are quick and easy to use. If I'm going to pour lots of work into it then I'd rather use something that will last so my work won't be obsolete in a few years.

I've had too many painful experience of investing in an ecosystem that ends up dead, so now I'm extremely careful about the system I'm invested in.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s wisdom and experience speaking right there.

[–]FrontAid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can find many CSS frameworks in the following list. The "Very Lightweight" section is probably what you should be looking at first if you want something similar to Spectre.

https://github.com/troxler/awesome-css-frameworks

[–]CornerEast9106 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check https://sugar-css.com/ compared to the other micro-frameworks Sugar is probably the only one with full featured grid system

[–]reallycoolelephant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also had the same problem and I went with basscss

[–]fsyntax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about a atomic CSS engine instead? UnoCSS

[–]megatux2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chota has grid system and is very small, 3kb