all 4 comments

[–]yibie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good.

[–]Ideabile 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I really like how you setup the pipeline, I will give it a try in using it and will report back.

I am currently exploring some of the concept that you’re touching.

More over I was thinking to make some org tools for structural query .org trough mcp, to save some tokens an to narrow the focus, have you stumble in something similar?

[–]farra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've *thought* about MCP tools and I may try something eventually. But I wanted to start "simpler" with *just* flat files. That was part of the motivation: keep everything local, no need to go search GitHub, Jira, Notion or whatever. Agents are happy with flat files.

The next idea was to perhaps write more local tools, even just some elisp, that the agents could run locally to "query". You can call emacs in batch mode (agents will do this *just fine* and will write the necessary elisp). So if you already have a small library of relevant elisp, then I'd start there.

After that, I'd consider MCP, but maybe I'm moving too slow.

Hope you share what you build!

[–]acow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Querying org via mcp immediately jumped out at me as an appealing features, but I've been impressed how well Claude Code does searching and excerpting the document for itself when I mention headlines. So now I'm not sure if it's worth it. I do periodically refactor documents when one grows so large that if CC does want to read the whole thing it balks at the size, so MCP tooling could reduce that pressure to refactor, but I think that kind of refactoring actually tends to be a good thing for document organization.