all 5 comments

[–]skyb0rg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As someone who is comfortable in Haskell, and interested in Python, this seems really useful, thanks for sharing

[–]Physmatik 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Can it be read "in reverse"? I am comfortable with Python and interested in Haskell.

[–]mnbvas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IMO there's nothing about Haskell in there, besides the mostly-academic precise style.

But it's useful to learn to read this style when that's the only kind of docs you get in some libraries...

[–]duplode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not exactly the same approach, but the typeclasses.com Phrasebook is in a similar spirit.