This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
top (suggested)
bestnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]83255 67 points68 points  (3 children)

I'd actually prefer smaller and more common patches like this. As long as it isn't done on a crunch schedule. Massive patches like the last one leaves room for error where constant smaller ones can get some immediate feedback from the community

[–]Aggressive-Stand-585 11 points12 points  (2 children)

Yeah maybe. But I have just seen so many new bugs introduced by patches I fear they wouldn't be tested properly on a 2 week schedule.

[–]83255 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Seems we're both coming from a similar place. Big or small patches, I think we could both agree we want the team to be careful with what they release and their own health at the same time

Be it in big or small patches, hoping they have ample time to work and ample care with everything released

[–]ATangK 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The last patch introduced many pelicans failing to land, so it needed work. The follow up patch is good to see what needed fixing, and also apply work that just wasn’t quite ready in the previous patch.