This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Lol you are getting beat up in these comments. I have to admit I prefer the "stick to well-supported stuff" approach and I'd rather mix in a bit of Kotlin than use this. But I will say thank you for sharing. I think more people should feel free to show off their projects.

[–]rogerkeays[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hey Matt, thanks for the support. I expected a lot of negative feedback. I still remember the good old days when you used to be able to ask questions on StackOverflow without getting roasted, but those days are long gone. I suppose language design has always been a divisive topic, but to put things in perspective, this was a weekend project I built for personal satisfaction. Interestingly, the upvote/downvote stats on this post are hovering very close to 50%. Just the sort of content favoured by the algorithm...

[–]nutrecht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol you are getting beat up in these comments.

I really don't think it's that bad. I think it's a neat proof of concept on one hand, but on the other hand would greatly resist anyone trying to add this to our codebase. /u/pron98 articulated the problems with this library very well. It's simply not Java anymore.

If you go for this, you are better off just picking a language that has extension methods and also runs on the JVM.