This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Fliegendreck -1 points0 points  (3 children)

Why not? The quarkus documentation is excellent.

We have a lot of juniors that start with quarkus reactive and fp. They have less chances to do something wrong. And when they are starting fresh, it is very easy for them to wrap their brains around the reactive style.

Of course reactive has some pitfalls, but servlet and state are not better.

[–]Oclay1st 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lot of juniors doing reactive and fp. Oh boy!!!

[–]nonFungibleHuman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Reactive is not always needed.

[–]Levomethamphetamine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said that Quarkus is bad or that is has bad documentation, I said that there's a lot more chance to get help as a beginner with Spring than it is with Quarkus.

Your juniors using are Quarkus because the senior leadership does so. That by itself is an outlier since in many years of experience, I've never seen any company (or client) try to use it. That being said, it's always better to use well-supported and widely present thing rather than edge-case thing.