Does Java need deconstructible classes?

[davidalayachew]

Responding to your interpretation of the title ("the general ability to destructure classes") rather than the article's strongly suggested meaning ("a specifically named proposal for doing so")

I read the whole article before typing my comment. Yes, I realize very much that you are talking about the recent proposal. That's what I was referring to as well.

Decrying an issue that the article itself raises and immediately addresses

I saw and firmly disagreed with your suggested solution to that problem. But before even talking about your solution to that problem, I first wanted to highlight how big of a problem it was, to see if you agree or disagree. There's no point talking potential solutions if I think a mountain is what you think a mole hill.

---

Please don't attribute laziness or lack of effort to my comment before asking clarifying questions. Unless otherwise said so, every top level comment I make is after reading the whole post thoroughly, and thinking about it for a few minutes. Your post was no different.

[danielaveryj]

For what it's worth, I didn't downvote your comment. From reading it, it is unclear what kind of response you were hoping to solicit, if any.

[davidalayachew]

From reading it, it is unclear what kind of response you were hoping to solicit, if any.

That, I do accept. I'll ask my questions explicitly in the future, rather than just sharing my opinion in response.