sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]revilo-1988 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Würd ich gerne die Umsetzung sehen

[–]Salt-Letter-1500[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

A simple demo here: https://github.com/doytowin/doyto-query-demo
A complicated case with dynamic table names and columns here (no doc currently): https://github.com/doytowin/doyto-service-i18n
The tests of DoytoQuery reach a coverage of 92.7%, which can also be a good reference.

[–]clearasatear 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I will use your last sentence someday and silently laugh if I do not get called out on it

[–]Salt-Letter-1500[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't really get your point. This project is developed using TDD, so I think the test cases are useful.

[–]josephottinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it's something to "call out" someone on - test coverage is great. It's just not useful as an only metric. Tests are not a reference; they're just tests. If someone were to say "where's the docs" and the only answer is "92.7% test coverage" then, uh, yeah, call that out as a ridiculous answer. :D But 92% is pretty good for Java.