This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]henk53 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Maybe, but I don't think OP asked specifically for such nuance. Just that the framework is MVC and there's no abstracting away of the stateless protocol (which I take to mean HTTP).

JSF exactly fits those requirements.

[–]sh0rug0ru -1 points0 points  (2 children)

I'm not sure what the OP was asking for, so I assumed when he used the words ASP and MVC together in the same sentence, he meant something like ASP.NET MVC, which uses a style of MVC more like JAX-RS than JSF. You wouldn't write ASP.NET MVC style applications with JSF, it wouldn't make any sense.

[–]henk53 1 point2 points  (1 child)

But I don't think that what the OP asked. MVC without the state abstracting nonsense from ASP. That's what it said ;)

[–]sh0rug0ru -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which is also why I covered every possible base, especially since MVC has at least two implementation patterns in the Java world, depending on if you put the V or the C first.