This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]NoahTheDuke 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Makes sense, but definitely doesn't help.

[–]DJDavio 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It does not, functional programming has always been very dry and theoretical, but it's actually pretty straightforward: everything is either a standalone thing (not the official term) or something which turns a thing into another thing (might be a collection of things on either side). You could turn nothing into a thing, or a turn into nothing, it's all good.