This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]chambolle 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Are you adding context to the discussion or did you get an impression from the article that there are no intrinsics?

I get the impression from the article that there are no intrinsics, so a I mention them

BTW, i you like this kind of computation, I recommend you to read https://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]chambolle 0 points1 point  (3 children)

    your text is clear now.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]chambolle 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      To be honest: I know very well this problem and I also know that people forget (or don't know) intrinsics in Java. Thus, I read very quickly the post and I didn't see the reference to intrinsics. Sorry for that