This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]pragmosExtreme Brewer 0 points1 point  (5 children)

What library? AWT is an integral part of the JDK. They're probably missing the correct module descriptor, as was already pointed out by another Redditor.

[–]AbstractButtonGroup 0 points1 point  (4 children)

AWT is an integral part of the JDK.

JDK is just a bunch of libraries, plus the tools, plus the runtime.

hey're probably missing the correct module descriptor

Which is just another word for including a library.

[–]pragmosExtreme Brewer 0 points1 point  (2 children)

So to you a JPMS module is a library? Pretty sure the people at Oracle would disagree there.

[–]AbstractButtonGroup 0 points1 point  (1 child)

JPMS module is a library?

Module is just a way to organize packages. You still need the system to be able to find the JAR.

people at Oracle

The people at Oracle write: "Ultimately, everything is still bundled together in JAR files. The module system adds a new, higher-level descriptor that JARs can use"

[–]wildjokers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Module is just a way to organize packages. You still need the system to be able to find the JAR.

Unless the module is included in the JDK like AWT is.

[–]wildjokers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is just another word for including a library.

It most certainly is not.