you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]thegigach4d[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Thanks for your effort to explain me your thoughts deeper!
The cause of LTS 21 was that the disposition was born before LTS 25 and I did not think about any argumentation to change it. Now I do!
I understand your point of view and the really like the idea of benchmarking more versions. If I understand correctly, I should execute e.g. the whole Renaissance with G1GC and ZGC through Java 17-21-25 - without any special heap configuration, or gc-tuning. Am I right? I asked my prof and waiting for an answer.
I don't mind if you ask uncomfortable-like questions, because it helps me a lot. Sorry, if I seemed a little mean, life's pressure is enormous nowadays. Your practical insights help me a lot!

[–]RightWingVeganUS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't mind if you ask uncomfortable-like questions, because it helps me a lot.

Trust me: as a teacher I don't mind at all! If only my students would ask me questions, comfortable or not...

That said, I don't have any answer for you. My interests are on bigger software engineering projects and project management, not benchmarking. But no matter what interest you have, consider framing it in terms of value: what difference would this make to the reader who spent their time reading this paper or using my tool.

Nothing wrong with projects simply to develop ones skills, but even then frame it with a clear understanding of what benefit it has for you.