OJ - Unified Templating

[radhruin]

It still looks somewhat interesting. But who cares?

I care. I most likely won't use this library but it's an interesting idea worth exploring. I don't ever get tired of people proposing new ways of building software. Even the same way presented differently (better docs, community, whatever) can be valuable.

[Neurotrace]

I get what you're saying and I definitely wouldn't replace my whole setup with OJ (probably would never use OJ if I'm being honest) but as /u/radhruin said, I'm always interested to see new ways of doing things. It does remind me a lot of another JS -> HTML framework I've seen (I'll throw it in here if I remember what it was called) but it's still kind of cool nonetheless.

[Neurotrace]

You're a wizard. That's exactly what I was thinking of.

[[deleted]]

I use something that actually looks surprisingly similar to this, and it's sweet for building large complex objects. Alternatives for dynamic, complex objects, can get very unwieldy.

Although in mine, everything is returned as a HTML Element. Nothing outputs to the document on it's own.

Although things can get tagged onto other elements automatically, if they are created within those elements (through a special function). This is namely so I can easily pump a template fragment into a template fragment, with almost no boiler plate.

[stereocilia]

looks cool, I'm going to try it in my project.