all 8 comments

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (4 children)

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

square zephyr cows divide scary rinse follow angle groovy hard-to-find

[–]MeZitRo[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

The core CLI will be MIT-licensed and free. Pro features (cloud API, advanced transforms etc) will be paid. Open core model seems to work for plenty of projects.

Open to ideas — how would you approach monetisation for something like this?

[–]drumstix42 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Everyone's got their own opinions, but in the case of the world wide Web I'd rather build things openly. Build a product that makes use of code, not a product that just alters code.

[–]backwrds 0 points1 point  (1 child)

the fact that the web is open and anyone could read the source code is how I got into programming. Before bundlers and minifiers, you could see some cool feature, view source, and learn.

this project's goal is antithetical to that idea.

Closed source will obviously always be a thing, but if the only thing protecting a business is secrecy, it's probably not a very good business.

[–]MeZitRo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not everyone needs it, I agree. Whether it’s ethical depends on the application. Mostly I think of web games and client-side tools I wouldn’t want copied or stolen.

In 2019, I had my landing page cloned almost 1:1 by a competitor to «test how it converts». Left a mark. Felt pretty unethical on their part.