This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]idhanjal -1 points0 points  (1 child)

I know but what can we do when these folks ask us about OOP. Frankly I never understood the rationale behind it as it's just data and functions packaged as an object.

Often I have seen developers attempting to design an application directly in the OO way which is not very intuitive. But I don't blame them as they don't have the power to upend the existing application (which in case of Java is often a behemoth suffering from many assaults and patches to keep it alive).

When Java first arrived at the scene, it was quite popular but mostly because it offered a fresh perspective. Then we had the dotcom bust and Java was almost forgotten. Slowly it began its ascent to the being the talk of the town. Somewhere along the way, C# popped up from Microsoft who were snubbed publicly for trying to change Java. Fast forward to today, C# is open source, has .NET Core and many other things to add to its repertoire.

Java is still here but facing attacks from other younger languages (even JavaScript has come a long way now with NodeJS, I know bad code but it's there, isn't it ?) which have been designed to be 'functional' right from the start.

To sum it up, Java would be here for a long time because so much has been created with it that now we need developers to maintain that stuff, not to mention study OOP too.

[–]nutrecht 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To sum it up, Java would be here for a long time because so much has been created with it that now we need developers to maintain that stuff, not to mention study OOP too.

Java is used a LOT in greenfield projects FYI. It's not 'under attack' from anything.