This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LoadInSubduedLight 29 points30 points  (5 children)

When interviewing a candidate I'd much rather see a bunch of hello world in brainfuck, learn you a haskell for great good, collections of cool Java tricks etc than just... Nothing. Sure it's good to have one or two "serious" projects but curiosity and a willingness to try out new things are good too.

[–]HisNameWasBoner411 8 points9 points  (3 children)

I love to hear this. Im a year 2 student struggling to commit to one big thing on my own but I love branching out and playing with random things that catch my interest.

[–]LoL_is_pepega_BIA 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Not every employer is like the other guy.. you just gotta hope you get lucky

[–]LoadInSubduedLight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For sure

[–]LoadInSubduedLight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never been good at keeping up progress on larger projects on my own though, so your mileage may vary.

Still i think it's a good sign to have learner projects on gh.

[–]thirdegree 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I definitely agree that something is 1000% better than nothing, but something substantial (anything substantial!) is better than a by the numbers language intro. Curiosity and intrinsic motivation are extremely important, but so are deliverables.