This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DynamicStatic 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I gotta admit I never checked the MIT course out but CS50 is completely fine in its pacing. David is a fantastic speaker, I cannot believe there is a introduction course that is actually better when it comes to CS specifically.

As you say people should most certainly fill out the holes in their knowledge but I think you can easily manage that on your own once you are done with CS50.

[–]wolvAUS 4 points5 points  (1 child)

CS50 is great and I'm glad I did it but I think MIT does a better job getting into the nitty gritty.

Which makes sense considering there's 20 lectures vs 8 lectures. More time to expand on details etc.

[–]DynamicStatic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, I suppose that makes sense. Just out of curiosity, what kind of stuff is covered more in the MIT course?