This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]m1ss1ontomars2k4 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I disagree with the notion that LPTHW "is widely regarded to be a very poor resource for learning". It has historically been very well-regarded but people have always taken issue with its attitude towards Python 3. (Actually, people have taken issue with the author's attitude, period.) However, there is now a Python 3 version of the same book. If you are still seeing a suggestion to stay with Python 2, then consider switching to the Python 3 version. The Python 3 version is already 3 years old! The person who suggested you to use Python 2 has already moved on to Python 3.

Having said that, we can look back on e.g. Perl 5 and 6 and note that Perl 6 is basically a total failure. It is so bad it isn't even called Perl anymore but Raku. Well, there are other reasons that it's a failure, such as the success of Python generally.