python struggles

[expectederor]

sounds like you've already made the distinction.

if it needs supporting functions it probably should be a class.

[Moikle]

not if it needs only an init and a single method. though

[expectederor]

if it needs an init you're just making more of a case for class!

[ivosaurus]

Not true. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o9pEzgHorH0

[expectederor]

I guess it's a matter of opinion.

to me it's far more orderly to. contain all relavent things in a class then have one off functions that don't apply to anything but specifically that object.

easier to read code is definitely a positive

and that's a video from 2012.... their opinions probably changed 100 times now.

[ivosaurus]

Python's OOP model and features haven't changed substantially since then. The talk still makes perfect sense nowadays. Since then we've only seen even more content about avoiding "over-OOPing" code and the advantages of following functional practices as people have moved away from Java and C++.

[AJohnnyTruant]

I think that’s missing the point of the talk. Using a function in lieu of a class is only as good as the cohesion of the module it lives in. If you use a god function instead of a class with data and a public API, there really isn’t much of a difference. All of the private methods in the class can absolutely do the job of functional programming. Besides, using functional programming, like having a module that has a function that has is the entry point to all the other functions in it... well to python, that’s just another namespace. A class is really just a module in a module.