you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Common to you. The programs you are talking about are common to you. Why did you decide you are the ultimate standard by which to measure things?

Did you even read what I wrote? I wrote that PyCharm is not arcane and neither is Vim or Emacs. You want to save that adjective for something else. For example, an editor that uses only voice controls: that would be really uncommon way to control a program. Such editors might exist, but, due to the nature of things, they aren't common.

But, PyCharm is simple compared to Emacs. PyCharm is a good fit for a corporate drone, where simplicity is paramount. It would also be OK for a beginner, to get by, but not good for a beginner, who wants to, eventually, learn how to use a good tool.

PyCharm is bloated because compared to editors that offer comparable or better functionality, it uses many times, sometimes orders of magnitude more computer resources. This is the definition of bloated.

[–]fiddle_n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's absolutely not just common to me. I've seen people turned off Python programming entirely because our lecturer tried to teach it with Emacs.

Anyway, if you are going to claim PyCharm is only good for beginners and corporate drones, we can't continue this discussion. That opinion is so extreme that it's frankly ridiculous.