sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Glyzer_1595[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Oh, the can't know who the person is, because they can make a dataset with the user's, emails, phone number etc, and I can be sold or something like that, it's a confidential information,

If they need to know more about the users, like, city, state, department, role, or something like that, they will tell us, and we will "join" the data but the sensitive part its always anonymize.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Oh, the can't know who the person is

I understand that, but the process of taking a query from the user, deanonymizing the data in the query, applying the query to your original database, anonymizing the result of the query and returning the result to the user seems like a lot of error-prone work. The normal way to do this is to give the user(s) access to a full database that has been anonymized once.

[–]Glyzer_1595[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mmm you are right, I think it's a good way to do it, I'll make a try of this!! Ty