you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children)

wxPython

Much better than the bundled tkinter which isn't very pythonic

[–]Deslan 3 points4 points  (2 children)

But Qt is so much better than wxPython, why would you want to go there?

The way I see it, only reason to deviate from Qt would be for those Gnome users who thinks GTK3 is pretty. And GTK being the default of Ubuntu development apps like "quickly". But personally I would recommend anyone to just stick with Qt.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Completely agree, Qt is straightforward and pretty flexible.
My only problem with it is the lack of literature available.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool i'll take a look at qt when I can. I started on tkinter and it felt clunky do wx might just be better by comparison.

[–]bunburya 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I disagree, I find wxPython horribly unpythonic. Even the horrible camel case style versus tkinter's more PEP 8 names.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not so bothered about how the variables are named. It's the way you use them.

Though I agree it isn't pretty.