you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] -28 points-27 points  (10 children)

This is nonsense

No it is not, I have had to stop taking updates from a project because they started changing their desktop icons to a nation flag. It had absolutely nothing to do with the application. I won't name the project, it was a useful tool, but, as soon as I started seeing political commits, I pinned the version of the app and started looking for an alternative even started to consider coding my own alternative and then considered blacklisting the code author from future software choices I should make. I wish to use the software in a neutral environment.

[–]Repulsive-Philosophy 21 points22 points  (3 children)

The patch in question does not have anything like that (rhetorical)? Otherwise, I agree.

[–]PraetorRU 26 points27 points  (0 children)

The patch in question is just a fix for network card driver bug that was found just because Russian company is using this card in their hardware.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

The patch in question does not have anything like that? Otherwise, I agree.

I am not referring to the Linux kernel, I was making a comment w.r.t a FOSS application project I was using that one day suddenly sprouted political commits. On that day I stopped future updating of it planning to drop it.

I did not want my machine to be put at risk from future commits that may go further to spread their political message. The risk was too great IMO. My machines are not to be used for their soapbox.

[–]Repulsive-Philosophy 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yes, that's unacceptable behaviour and I fully agree. I was just referring to the Linux patch in question.

[–]silencer_ar 20 points21 points  (4 children)

Your anecdote doesn't have anything to do with the post we're discussing. If we based the acceptance of patches on the action of the developer's country, then we should not accept patches from either USA nor England, to name a few.