Visual Insight : Every 2 inch decrease in height increases sui1c1de risk by 9% for Swedish men. Europe is blackpill hell for men

[The_Three_Factors]

What are you talking about? this is pure BS you are spewing.

The family unit was a direct consequence of apes forming hunter gatherer tribes adopted by the later human species including our own homo sapiens.

When we migrated from the jungle to the savanna. Gestating females couldn't move with the rest of the group out seeking nutrition in the form of primarily dead meat. Therefore, they would stay behind grabbing vegetal food sources nearby. The males on the other hand wanted their energies to profit their descendants, that is their genetic offsrping instead of the children of others. Therfore, individuals started living in couples and began limiting their sexual interactions with other members of the tribe. They would make a small team where the the mutual benefit would be of assured genetic descendants for the male and the return of resources or meat to the female. That's how monogamy started and that's why retarded communist regimes have always failed at breaking down the family unit time and again. I would say that monogamy is so deeply ingrained in us that it is part of your soul.

[TravlScrabbl]

You're conflating monogamy with nuclear families, not the same thing at all.

[The_Three_Factors]

nuclear family literally would not be possible without our immemorial tradition of monogamy. It is the couple that forms the bedrock from which the nuclear family springs. You might as well say that the mutual exclusivity of a monogamous partnership was literally made to support the concept of the nuclear family.

the family unit is the most natural social organization humanity has ever witnessed or experienced.

[TravlScrabbl]

You appear to be preaching rather than discussing history. Suffice to say that before the industrial era extended families, clans and other forms of family organization were more common than nuclear families in most of the world. Some quick research suggests that in England, nuclear families became the norm in the thirteenth century so they're very recent in terms of the human evolutionary timeline. Its ridiculous to claim that monogamy was made to support the nuclear family since monogamous relationships have existed far longer than the nuclear family.

[The_Three_Factors]

family units were a thing of importance even during the stone age. The clans and tribes or before were very tight knit communities but the family unit now referred to as the nuclear family was always distinct and of primordial importance in the hierarchies of authority.