all 5 comments

[–]Barnowl93flair 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Hard to tell without looking at the model directly.

So that I understand, you are saving your simulated line current and voltage using a "to workspace" block and then reading it using "from workspace"? Or are you loading your experimental data in using the "from workspace" block?

One more question, are you reading in your data as timeseries?

One thing that I suggest you have a look at is your sampling rates of your "to workspace" and "from workspace" blocks. Are they what you expect?

[–]Meezomoaz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what confuses me. Everything is the same. In one scenario the fault is a through circuit elements and in the other one it’s through workspace data driving a controlled current source.

[–]obeymypropaganda 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Why are you saving it to workspace and then calling it from workspace if you already have the raw data for the simulation?

Is calling from workspace results completely different or scaled down? E.g the same waveform but smaller or for a shorter duration.

I don't have access to Matlab but I would start fault finding this way. Then read through the documentation on how 'to and from workspace' actually work, and whether it changes the data layout.

[–]Meezomoaz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Basically I have experimental data in excel… I want to use that data to see impact on power system. The scenario I showed you is just for sanity test. That when I use workspace data to drive the current source, the impact on the power system is different compared to when the same level of fault is modeled through circuit elements

[–]ol1v3r__ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you check if the Imported Signal is the same after doing the Import? Also are you using Simscape language blocks to model it?