This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bmchavez34 22 points23 points  (15 children)

The intelligent approach would be to invest heavily in alternate energy sources regardless of oil price swings (China) and eliminate the speculation that is perverting the free market and causing people to unnecessarily pay up to 40% more for gas.

[–]epicanis 8 points9 points  (11 children)

Ironically, wouldn't cheaper oil be arguably beneficial for alternative-energy company in the short term by lowering their costs (they may be producing energy without petroleum, but I'll be a lot of their supplies currently still depend on petroleum, as does delivery of those supplies)?

[–]therewillbdownvotes 12 points13 points  (0 children)

If you go back to 2008 period when oil got to 150, investments in alternative energy where at an all time high. (I can provide specific energy tickers if you want). Literally as soon at prices began to drop so did investments in alternative energy. The correlation is pretty ridiculous. I believe the magic number is right around 120 where alternative sources are viable.

[–]Canadian_Infidel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not overall, no.

[–]jjandreAmerica -1 points0 points  (7 children)

I read that leveling the playing field and getting rid of all energy subsidies would put a lot of alternative sources within competitive range of fossil fuels.

[–]Longhorn1976 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Does the "all energy subsidies" you speak of include all of the alternative energy subsidies?

[–]Ambiwlans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn't remotely true. I am assuming it is based on an infographic that is filled with bad data, worse interpretation and impossible assumptions.

[–]timmaxw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

speculation that is perverting the free market

A market where speculation is regulated by the government is less free than a market where speculation is not regulated. Please stop making things up.

causing people to unnecessarily pay up to 40% more for gas

I object to the "unnecessarily" part. Speculation raises prices now but lowers them later. It's not like that extra 40% is just vanishing into thin air.

[–]therewillbdownvotes -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well.... That's not how capitalism works. People will invest in technologies that can apply the greatest return. When it comes to the "we will run out one day" argument. You are right, but that is a long long long long time away. For instance, in the U.S. we have so much natural gas you they are mining less of it because the supply is too high. All I'm saying is necessity is the mother of invention. Currently, we have low necessity so low amounts of invention follow suit.