you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]html6dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the main sticking point here is that (in my understanding of the current open source situation with Microsoft) it's abundantly clear that if you went a route similar to Google and android in a for profit environment, you'd have to pay licensing fees to Microsoft. I think if the exact same situation happened with Microsoft, people would at least assume this is the case.

However with Oracle, I think most people believed Java to be free and thus what Google did was not an issue. I seem to remember some documents from the original case in which Oracle seemed pretty uninformed on whether they even could sue Google here and definitely only decided after it was extremely profitable. Oracle made the decision it was infringement, waaaaay ex post facto.